Delaware's two recording statutes contradict each other, so the safe rule is to treat it like an all-party state and announce the recording to everyone on the call.
Because Delaware law is genuinely split between two conflicting statutes, a judge in a custody case could go either way on a secret recording; announcing it removes the question entirely and keeps your archive usable no matter which statute controls.
Recommended: an announced, dated archive of your own line.
Keep an announced, dated archive
In an all-party state, announce the recording — what judges prefer anyway. Copareo Secure Line keeps a lawful, time-stamped record of your line.
$9.90 once · no subscription, nothing to cancel
The short answer: Delaware’s law is genuinely split, so treat it as all-party
If you are a Delaware parent asking whether you can record a co-parenting call, the honest answer is more complicated than in most states: Delaware has two statutes that point in opposite directions. One allows you to record a call you are part of with only your own consent. The other requires everyone’s consent for the very same call. Because the conflict is real and unresolved, the prudent approach — the one this page recommends — is to treat Delaware as an all-party consent state and announce the recording.
What the two statutes actually say
Delaware’s wiretapping law, 11 Del. Code § 2402(c)(4), says it is lawful “for a person to intercept a wire, oral or electronic communication where the person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception,” so long as it is not done to commit a crime or a tort. Read on its own, that is a one-party consent rule, and violating it is a class E felony punishable by up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
But a separate chapter, Delaware’s privacy law at 11 Del. Code § 1335(a)(4), makes it unlawful for a person, without the consent of all parties, to “intercept… a message by telephone, telegraph, letter or other means of communicating privately, including private conversation.” Read on its own, that is an all-party rule — and violating it is a class A misdemeanor (up to one year in jail, a fine of up to $2,300). So the two statutes disagree not only on how much consent you need, but on how serious a violation is: the stricter all-party statute actually carries the lighter maximum penalty.
Why the conflict matters for you
If you record your own call with your co-parent without telling them, you are fully compliant with § 2402 — you are a party, so one-party consent is satisfied. But that same recording can still violate § 1335, because that statute asks for everyone’s consent regardless of whether you are a participant. At least one federal court has read a “party to the conversation” exception into the privacy law as well, but that reading is not settled Delaware law. Until the Delaware courts or legislature resolve the conflict, the safe assumption for a parent building a legal record is that an unannounced recording could be challenged under § 1335, even though it is clearly lawful under § 2402.
Federal law does not resolve the conflict either. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d), a party to a communication may record it, which mirrors Delaware’s one-party wiretap statute but does not override the stricter state privacy law. Federal law sets a floor, not a ceiling: a state is free to require more consent than the federal act does, and Delaware’s privacy statute appears to do exactly that, at least on its face.
Notable exception and the practical fix
Neither statute punishes an announced recording: once every party to the call knows it is being recorded and continues the conversation, you have effectively obtained everyone’s consent, satisfying § 1335 as well as § 2402. That is why this page — like Delaware’s own legal commentators — recommends announcing the recording out loud at the start of the call, or keeping a consistently announced, dated archive of your line, rather than leaning on the one-party reading alone.
Using a recording in a Delaware custody case
An announced recording sidesteps the whole debate and is generally usable as evidence in a Delaware Family Court matter, subject to the ordinary rules of relevance and reliability. A recording made secretly is riskier: even if a court ultimately accepts the one-party reading of § 1335, opposing counsel can and will raise the conflict to attack how the evidence was obtained, which distracts from the substance of your case. Keep any recording complete and unedited, note the date and participants, and let your attorney decide how to present it.
Recording across state lines: the strictest-rule caveat
Because Delaware’s own law is ambiguous, this is one state where the general advice to “follow the strictest rule when a call crosses state lines” is really just an extension of the advice for calls that stay entirely inside Delaware: announce it. If your co-parent lives in Pennsylvania, Maryland or another all-party state, the announced-recording habit protects you in both directions at once. See call-recording laws in all 50 states to check the rule for wherever the other parent is located.
How to document it so it holds up
Given Delaware’s own uncertainty, the strongest habit is consistency: announce every recording the same way, keep the full, unedited file rather than a trimmed clip, and log the date, time and everyone present. Preserve full text threads instead of cropped screenshots, and store copies somewhere outside the phone itself, in case the device is lost or replaced. A predictable, always-announced routine is not just legally safer in a split-authority state like Delaware — it also reads, to a judge, as the behavior of someone documenting in good faith rather than someone building a “gotcha.”
Frequently asked questions
Is Delaware a one-party or all-party consent state?
Neither, cleanly. Delaware’s wiretap statute (§ 2402) is one-party; its privacy statute (§ 1335) is all-party. The two conflict, and the prudent, protective reading is to treat Delaware as all-party.
What happens if I record my co-parent without announcing it?
You would not violate § 2402 because you are a party to the call. But you could be exposed under § 1335, which does not carve out participants as clearly. Announcing the recording avoids the question entirely.
Is announcing the recording enough to make it lawful?
Yes. Once every party is told the call is being recorded and continues talking, you have obtained everyone’s consent, which satisfies both statutes.
Can a secretly recorded call still be used in Family Court?
It might be, since the one-party wiretap statute supports it, but expect the other side to challenge how it was obtained. An announced recording avoids that fight before it starts.
Does announcing the recording ruin the value of the conversation as evidence?
No. Judges do not discount a recording simply because everyone knew about it — if anything, an announced recording is easier to authenticate and harder for the other side to challenge as secretly obtained.
Can my co-parent also announce and record our calls?
Yes, and it is a good habit for both of you: once the recording is announced, both parents are on equal footing and neither side can later claim it was made in secret.
Bottom line
Delaware’s two recording statutes do not agree with each other, and no court has cleanly resolved the conflict. Announce your recording, keep a dated archive, and treat Delaware as an all-party state to stay on the safe side. Read how to document a co-parenting conflict for court for how to build that kind of court-ready record.
How Copareo Secure Line helps in Delaware: Delaware’s two statutes pull in opposite directions, so the safe habit is to announce every recording as if all-party consent applied — and Copareo does that for you automatically at the start of each call. For a one-time $9.90, with no subscription and nothing to cancel, it captures your calls and texts, transcribes them, and time-stamps the archive with an admissibility one-pager your attorney can use.
Not legal advice. This page summarizes Delaware law for general information and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed Delaware attorney. Recording and evidence rules change and courts decide admissibility case by case. Verify against the official statutes (11 Del. Code § 1335 and § 2402) and consult an attorney about your situation.